https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431139 Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to questions relating to a supply of goods or services that is being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. A completed transaction does not satisfy that statutory requirement, because the mechanism is meant to address ongoing or prospective supplies. As the application was filed after completion of the operation and maintenance work, the subject matter was not a live or proposed supply and fell outside the Authority's jurisdiction. The application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431139 Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to questions relating to a supply of goods or services that is being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. A completed transaction does not satisfy that statutory requirement, because the mechanism is meant to address ongoing or prospective supplies. As the application was filed after completion of the operation and maintenance work, the subject matter was not a live or proposed supply and fell outside the Authority's jurisdiction. The application was therefore not maintainable and was rejected. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431139