<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 243 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, holding that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing an opportunity for cross-examination and relying on documentary evidence rather than presumptions and investigation reports. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption of long-term capital gain under Section 10(38) and delete the addition of estimated commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 243 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, holding that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing an opportunity for cross-examination and relying on documentary evidence rather than presumptions and investigation reports. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the exemption of long-term capital gain under Section 10(38) and delete the addition of estimated commission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>