<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 137 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31128</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals under Section 35E(2) require authorisation by the adjudicating authority; where the appeal was instead filed by the Assistant Commissioner (Review), it was treated as not maintainable. On valuation, goods exported to Bhutan were held assessable under Section 4 on transaction value, because Section 4A applies only when the manufacturer is legally obliged to declare MRP under the applicable law. Export consignments not subject to such MRP obligation cannot be brought under Section 4A merely because the goods are otherwise specified for domestic clearance. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable, with refund and consequential relief following.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 137 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31128</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals under Section 35E(2) require authorisation by the adjudicating authority; where the appeal was instead filed by the Assistant Commissioner (Review), it was treated as not maintainable. On valuation, goods exported to Bhutan were held assessable under Section 4 on transaction value, because Section 4A applies only when the manufacturer is legally obliged to declare MRP under the applicable law. Export consignments not subject to such MRP obligation cannot be brought under Section 4A merely because the goods are otherwise specified for domestic clearance. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable, with refund and consequential relief following.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>