<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Bright Line Test (BLT)-based adjustment of Rs. 36,93,24,653/-. The total income assessment was revised, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles and precedents in Transfer Pricing disputes. The penalty proceedings were likely impacted by this decision, as the basis for the penalty was undermined following the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on the adjustment method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Bright Line Test (BLT)-based adjustment of Rs. 36,93,24,653/-. The total income assessment was revised, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles and precedents in Transfer Pricing disputes. The penalty proceedings were likely impacted by this decision, as the basis for the penalty was undermined following the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on the adjustment method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>