<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 230 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind, reliance on irrelevant material, and initiation based on suspicion rather than reliable information. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed. The Tribunal did not rule on the merits of the addition, rendering those arguments academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 230 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind, reliance on irrelevant material, and initiation based on suspicion rather than reliable information. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, and the reassessment proceedings were quashed. The Tribunal did not rule on the merits of the addition, rendering those arguments academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>