<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 224 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431107</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and ruling in favor of the respondent. It concluded that the assessing officer&#039;s adjustment disallowing the claim of interest on deposits under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable in law. The Court emphasized that prima facie adjustments could only be made in specific circumstances, which were not present in this case. The issue was deemed highly debatable, leading to the adjustment being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 09:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 224 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431107</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and ruling in favor of the respondent. It concluded that the assessing officer&#039;s adjustment disallowing the claim of interest on deposits under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable in law. The Court emphasized that prima facie adjustments could only be made in specific circumstances, which were not present in this case. The issue was deemed highly debatable, leading to the adjustment being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>