<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 207 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 invalid. The retrospective application of the amendment to Explanation to section 73 was upheld. Disallowance under section 14A and excess depreciation on fixed assets were deemed not subject to revision under section 263 due to time constraints and irrelevance to reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 207 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 invalid. The retrospective application of the amendment to Explanation to section 73 was upheld. Disallowance under section 14A and excess depreciation on fixed assets were deemed not subject to revision under section 263 due to time constraints and irrelevance to reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>