<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 206 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It found that the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) was unjustified as the assessee had adequate interest-free funds and followed systematic accounting. Additionally, the denial of deduction under Section 80IC was deemed unwarranted as the assessee met eligibility conditions and provided substantial evidence to support its claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 21:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 206 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It found that the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) was unjustified as the assessee had adequate interest-free funds and followed systematic accounting. Additionally, the denial of deduction under Section 80IC was deemed unwarranted as the assessee met eligibility conditions and provided substantial evidence to support its claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>