<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31117</link>
    <description>Extended limitation under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act could not be invoked for clearances made before a contrary departmental circular where the assessee had acted on a bona fide belief based on an earlier favourable circular. The later circular was held to operate prospectively and could not fasten liability for the prior period. Duty liability survived only for clearances made after 07-03-1990, and the Original Authority was required to quantify the demand for that post-circular period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31117</link>
      <description>Extended limitation under the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act could not be invoked for clearances made before a contrary departmental circular where the assessee had acted on a bona fide belief based on an earlier favourable circular. The later circular was held to operate prospectively and could not fasten liability for the prior period. Duty liability survived only for clearances made after 07-03-1990, and the Original Authority was required to quantify the demand for that post-circular period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>