https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080 The writ petition challenged GST recovery and assessment action, alleging that recovery from the electronic cash ledger during the pendency of an appeal was contrary to the pre-deposit regime, that no coercive recovery should follow until the appeal was decided, and that proceedings under Sections 73 and 74, as well as notices and summaries issued under Rule 142, were invalid without proper show cause notice and effective hearing. The petitioner later stated that the grievance had been redressed because the recovered amount had been reversed, and the petition was withdrawn. The Court accordingly dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080 The writ petition challenged GST recovery and assessment action, alleging that recovery from the electronic cash ledger during the pendency of an appeal was contrary to the pre-deposit regime, that no coercive recovery should follow until the appeal was decided, and that proceedings under Sections 73 and 74, as well as notices and summaries issued under Rule 142, were invalid without proper show cause notice and effective hearing. The petitioner later stated that the grievance had been redressed because the recovered amount had been reversed, and the petition was withdrawn. The Court accordingly dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. Case-Laws GST Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080