<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 197 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the State Tax Officer reversed the disputed recovery amount. The petitioner challenged multiple procedural aspects of GST assessment, including recovery during appeal, service of show cause notice, and principles of natural justice. Despite raising concerns about statutory compliance and order validity, the petitioner chose to withdraw the petition following the reversal of recovered funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 197 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the State Tax Officer reversed the disputed recovery amount. The petitioner challenged multiple procedural aspects of GST assessment, including recovery during appeal, service of show cause notice, and principles of natural justice. Despite raising concerns about statutory compliance and order validity, the petitioner chose to withdraw the petition following the reversal of recovered funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>