<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31114</link>
    <description>The court determined that twisting and texturizing of Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) constitutes manufacturing, qualifying for deductions under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. Expert opinions and case law supported the finding that the process results in a distinct product with altered properties. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal. The issue of applying res judicata in income-tax proceedings was deemed unnecessary for the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 313 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31114</link>
      <description>The court determined that twisting and texturizing of Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) constitutes manufacturing, qualifying for deductions under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. Expert opinions and case law supported the finding that the process results in a distinct product with altered properties. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal. The issue of applying res judicata in income-tax proceedings was deemed unnecessary for the appeal&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>