<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 163 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of section 263 was not justified as the Assessing Officer had adequately inquired into the unaccounted income, making the assessment order under section 143(3) valid. The Tribunal emphasized that lack of inquiry by the AO did not render the order erroneous. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s revisional order was quashed, upholding the assessment framed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 163 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of section 263 was not justified as the Assessing Officer had adequately inquired into the unaccounted income, making the assessment order under section 143(3) valid. The Tribunal emphasized that lack of inquiry by the AO did not render the order erroneous. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s revisional order was quashed, upholding the assessment framed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>