<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 158 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal vacated the disallowance of Rs. 9,24,820/- sustained by the CIT(A), allowing the cross objection filed by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in applying legal principles and the need for the Revenue to establish a clear nexus between interest-bearing loans and non-business utilization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 158 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal vacated the disallowance of Rs. 9,24,820/- sustained by the CIT(A), allowing the cross objection filed by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in applying legal principles and the need for the Revenue to establish a clear nexus between interest-bearing loans and non-business utilization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>