https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431016 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, setting aside the impugned orders. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, allowing the cross-objection by the assessee. It granted a refund of the amount deposited, totaling Rs. 4,23,81,640/-, along with interest as per rules. The Tribunal reaffirmed that the "place of removal" is the manufacturer's premises and that freight charges are not includible in the assessable value for calculating excise duty. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431016 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, setting aside the impugned orders. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, allowing the cross-objection by the assessee. It granted a refund of the amount deposited, totaling Rs. 4,23,81,640/-, along with interest as per rules. The Tribunal reaffirmed that the "place of removal" is the manufacturer's premises and that freight charges are not includible in the assessable value for calculating excise duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431016