<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 131 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant and the District Co-operative Milk Producers Union (DCMPU) are not &quot;related persons&quot; under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act. As a result, the transaction value at which the goods were sold should be accepted, and the differential duty demand confirmed by the Revenue was set aside. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 131 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant and the District Co-operative Milk Producers Union (DCMPU) are not &quot;related persons&quot; under Section 4(3)(b) of the Central Excise Act. As a result, the transaction value at which the goods were sold should be accepted, and the differential duty demand confirmed by the Revenue was set aside. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>