<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 130 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431013</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied on air travel agency services absent any material showing personal use or employee consumption; business travel recorded in the books was not enough to treat it as non-business expenditure. Credit denial on works contract services also failed because the reverse charge notification cited applied to individuals, partnership firms and HUFs, not to a private limited company, and the valuation or abatement notification relied on was inapplicable on the facts. The construction service disallowance was unsustainable because the appellate authority introduced a new basis beyond the show-cause notice and original order. The credit disallowances were therefore set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 130 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431013</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied on air travel agency services absent any material showing personal use or employee consumption; business travel recorded in the books was not enough to treat it as non-business expenditure. Credit denial on works contract services also failed because the reverse charge notification cited applied to individuals, partnership firms and HUFs, not to a private limited company, and the valuation or abatement notification relied on was inapplicable on the facts. The construction service disallowance was unsustainable because the appellate authority introduced a new basis beyond the show-cause notice and original order. The credit disallowances were therefore set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>