https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305449 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, emphasizing that judicial review is limited to the decision-making process and not the reappreciation of evidence. The Enquiry Officer's findings were supported by substantial evidence, proving the delinquent officer's misconduct. The acquittal in criminal proceedings did not affect the disciplinary action, and the punishment of dismissal from service was deemed proportionate. Consequently, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's decision, reinstated the dismissal order, and allowed the appeal filed by the appellant Bank. en-us Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 04 Dec 2022 18:20:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305449 The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, emphasizing that judicial review is limited to the decision-making process and not the reappreciation of evidence. The Enquiry Officer's findings were supported by substantial evidence, proving the delinquent officer's misconduct. The acquittal in criminal proceedings did not affect the disciplinary action, and the punishment of dismissal from service was deemed proportionate. Consequently, the Supreme Court quashed the High Court's decision, reinstated the dismissal order, and allowed the appeal filed by the appellant Bank. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305449