https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305433 Statutory appeals from judicial or quasi-judicial tribunals with the trappings of a civil court cannot validly be assigned to an executive authority for review, because such control conflicts with judicial review, the rule of law, and adjudicatory independence. The Court held the Administrator's appellate role under the Delhi municipal enactments unconstitutional and void. To preserve continuity, it directed that pending and future appeals lie to the District Judge, Delhi, until a proper judicial appellate mechanism is created, while completed decisions by the Administrator remain undisturbed through prospective overruling. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2022 18:02:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305433 Statutory appeals from judicial or quasi-judicial tribunals with the trappings of a civil court cannot validly be assigned to an executive authority for review, because such control conflicts with judicial review, the rule of law, and adjudicatory independence. The Court held the Administrator's appellate role under the Delhi municipal enactments unconstitutional and void. To preserve continuity, it directed that pending and future appeals lie to the District Judge, Delhi, until a proper judicial appellate mechanism is created, while completed decisions by the Administrator remain undisturbed through prospective overruling. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305433