<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1581 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305432</link>
    <description>The writ petition was allowed as the auction sale of seized betel nuts was deemed illegal due to lack of notice and undervaluation. The petitioner was directed to be paid Rs. 14,63,684 within four months, representing the difference between the assessed value and the amount already refunded, along with interest at 12% per annum. Any loss to the Department of Revenue was to be compensated by deducting from the responsible authorities&#039; pockets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 17:23:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1581 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305432</link>
      <description>The writ petition was allowed as the auction sale of seized betel nuts was deemed illegal due to lack of notice and undervaluation. The petitioner was directed to be paid Rs. 14,63,684 within four months, representing the difference between the assessed value and the amount already refunded, along with interest at 12% per annum. Any loss to the Department of Revenue was to be compensated by deducting from the responsible authorities&#039; pockets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>