<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 992 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305427</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee on April 10, 2013. The disallowance of expenditure treated as capital in nature was overturned, with the addition of Rs. 83,20,841 being deleted. Additionally, the disallowance of advances claimed as business loss was partially reversed, with certain advances being allowed as revenue expenditure under section 37(1). As a result, the ITAT granted relief to the assessee by partly allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 15:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 992 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305427</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee on April 10, 2013. The disallowance of expenditure treated as capital in nature was overturned, with the addition of Rs. 83,20,841 being deleted. Additionally, the disallowance of advances claimed as business loss was partially reversed, with certain advances being allowed as revenue expenditure under section 37(1). As a result, the ITAT granted relief to the assessee by partly allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>