<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305426</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, allowing the matter to be considered on merits. On the substantive issue, the Union of India conceded that the interest accrued on the deposited funds should be paid to the first respondent, and the Court found no merit in the petition. The amount earlier deposited in the name of the Registrar General was directed to be transferred to the first respondent&#039;s account in the U.K., subject to the furnishing of account details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 659 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305426</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, allowing the matter to be considered on merits. On the substantive issue, the Union of India conceded that the interest accrued on the deposited funds should be paid to the first respondent, and the Court found no merit in the petition. The amount earlier deposited in the name of the Registrar General was directed to be transferred to the first respondent&#039;s account in the U.K., subject to the furnishing of account details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>