<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 778 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305424</link>
    <description>The appellate court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a dishonored cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the appellant failed to establish a legally enforceable debt/liability, as the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under section 139 by demonstrating the cheque was not related to the disputed transaction. Insufficient evidence of a business relationship between the parties led to the dismissal of the appeal, confirming the original acquittal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 09:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 778 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305424</link>
      <description>The appellate court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving a dishonored cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the appellant failed to establish a legally enforceable debt/liability, as the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under section 139 by demonstrating the cheque was not related to the disputed transaction. Insufficient evidence of a business relationship between the parties led to the dismissal of the appeal, confirming the original acquittal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>