<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31101</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that two small scale industries should not be clubbed for SSI exemption purposes as they operated separately with distinct accounts, capital, premises, machinery, and labor. Additionally, the Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that packing charges should not be included in the assessable value, following a previous judgment. The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31101</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that two small scale industries should not be clubbed for SSI exemption purposes as they operated separately with distinct accounts, capital, premises, machinery, and labor. Additionally, the Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation that packing charges should not be included in the assessable value, following a previous judgment. The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>