<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 93 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the seized amount from the date of its deposit. Relying on legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal found errors in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal for a refund of interest at a specified rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 93 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the seized amount from the date of its deposit. Relying on legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal found errors in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal for a refund of interest at a specified rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>