<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Mere Allegations Insufficient to Rebut Presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Without Concrete Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66893</link>
    <description>Dishonor of cheque - rebuttal of presumption - Only lodging such a complaint of taking such cheque by force or threat is not sufficient enough to rebut presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act specifically when the accused admits her signature on the cheque.- HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:59:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Mere Allegations Insufficient to Rebut Presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Without Concrete Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66893</link>
      <description>Dishonor of cheque - rebuttal of presumption - Only lodging such a complaint of taking such cheque by force or threat is not sufficient enough to rebut presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act specifically when the accused admits her signature on the cheque.- HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:59:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>