https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305397 The Bombay Relief Undertaking Act, 1958 was treated as temporarily suspending remedies for enforcement of pre-existing liabilities during the notification period, while the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was described as providing the forum and procedure for debt adjudication and recovery. The two enactments were held to operate in different fields and to be capable of harmonious construction. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy was not treated as an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction, particularly where the Tribunal was said to lack jurisdiction and where intervention was needed to give effect to the relief undertaking notification. The preliminary objection based on alternative remedy was rejected. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:00:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305397 The Bombay Relief Undertaking Act, 1958 was treated as temporarily suspending remedies for enforcement of pre-existing liabilities during the notification period, while the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was described as providing the forum and procedure for debt adjudication and recovery. The two enactments were held to operate in different fields and to be capable of harmonious construction. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy was not treated as an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction, particularly where the Tribunal was said to lack jurisdiction and where intervention was needed to give effect to the relief undertaking notification. The preliminary objection based on alternative remedy was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305397