<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305410</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC noted the petitioner&#039;s submission that an application under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act would be filed before the respondent and, on that basis, closed the writ petition without prejudice to the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue that application. The operative effect is that the petitioner may proceed with the Section 119 request before the income tax authority, while the writ proceedings were not decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1357 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305410</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC noted the petitioner&#039;s submission that an application under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act would be filed before the respondent and, on that basis, closed the writ petition without prejudice to the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue that application. The operative effect is that the petitioner may proceed with the Section 119 request before the income tax authority, while the writ proceedings were not decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>