https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305407 The court found the petitioner failed to deposit TDS with the State of Jharkhand since 2007-08, leading to a complaint by a subcontractor. The petitioner attributed the non-deposit to inadvertence or mistake. The court directed the petitioner to add Directors and Chartered Accountants as respondents, requiring justification to avoid prosecution or license suspension. Audited balance sheets and reports were mandated from 2007-08, with the Registrar of Companies joining to verify. The State officers' oversight of TDS deductions was questioned, hinting at deliberate actions and connivance. Chartered Accountants must be present in court or engage advocates, with the Principal Accountant General assisting in audit matters. en-us Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:00:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305407 The court found the petitioner failed to deposit TDS with the State of Jharkhand since 2007-08, leading to a complaint by a subcontractor. The petitioner attributed the non-deposit to inadvertence or mistake. The court directed the petitioner to add Directors and Chartered Accountants as respondents, requiring justification to avoid prosecution or license suspension. Audited balance sheets and reports were mandated from 2007-08, with the Registrar of Companies joining to verify. The State officers' oversight of TDS deductions was questioned, hinting at deliberate actions and connivance. Chartered Accountants must be present in court or engage advocates, with the Principal Accountant General assisting in audit matters. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305407