<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1397 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305412</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, ruling that the demand for late fees for the specified periods under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was without authority and legally unsustainable. The court clarified the applicability of section 234E and the impact of the introduction of section 200A(1) in determining liability for late filing fees, holding that the petitioner was not liable to pay late fees for the period preceding 01.06.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1397 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305412</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, ruling that the demand for late fees for the specified periods under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was without authority and legally unsustainable. The court clarified the applicability of section 234E and the impact of the introduction of section 200A(1) in determining liability for late filing fees, holding that the petitioner was not liable to pay late fees for the period preceding 01.06.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>