https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305395 The Court upheld the Trial Court's decision in a case under the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, dismissing the complainant's application for special leave to appeal. The Court found the lack of proof of consideration and inconsistencies in the complainant's case to be compelling reasons for affirming the Trial Court's decision. The burden of proof and presumption under the Act were emphasized, with the defendant successfully casting doubt on the existence of consideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:47:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305395 The Court upheld the Trial Court's decision in a case under the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, dismissing the complainant's application for special leave to appeal. The Court found the lack of proof of consideration and inconsistencies in the complainant's case to be compelling reasons for affirming the Trial Court's decision. The burden of proof and presumption under the Act were emphasized, with the defendant successfully casting doubt on the existence of consideration, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305395