<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 922 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305391</link>
    <description>A purchaser of secured property through a private negotiated sale, with actual or constructive knowledge of outstanding commercial tax dues, cannot claim protection as a transferee for value without notice under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The commercial tax law created a first charge on the property, and that charge was not extinguished by the repeal of the earlier enactment by the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002. The purchaser therefore took the property subject to the statutory encumbrance, and the authorities could proceed in accordance with law. The writ petition failed, with liberty preserved to pursue the statutory remedy regarding the charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 11:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 922 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305391</link>
      <description>A purchaser of secured property through a private negotiated sale, with actual or constructive knowledge of outstanding commercial tax dues, cannot claim protection as a transferee for value without notice under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The commercial tax law created a first charge on the property, and that charge was not extinguished by the repeal of the earlier enactment by the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002. The purchaser therefore took the property subject to the statutory encumbrance, and the authorities could proceed in accordance with law. The writ petition failed, with liberty preserved to pursue the statutory remedy regarding the charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>