<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 89 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430972</link>
    <description>SC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal against GSTIN registration cancellation. Despite initial delay beyond statutory limitation periods, the court relied on Covid-related judicial extensions to remand the matter for substantive hearing. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal&#039;s merits without treating it as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 89 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430972</link>
      <description>SC allowed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal against GSTIN registration cancellation. Despite initial delay beyond statutory limitation periods, the court relied on Covid-related judicial extensions to remand the matter for substantive hearing. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal&#039;s merits without treating it as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>