https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430967 Pre-arrest bail was refused where the Court found the applicant's inconsistent stand on his status and business connection, together with material showing repeated pressure calls to the informant, sufficient to indicate breach of interim bail conditions. Although the FIR did not allege impersonation and the dispute appeared to have a financial character, those features did not persuade the Court to exercise the extraordinary discretion under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in favour of the applicant. The petition for pre-arrest bail was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430967 Pre-arrest bail was refused where the Court found the applicant's inconsistent stand on his status and business connection, together with material showing repeated pressure calls to the informant, sufficient to indicate breach of interim bail conditions. Although the FIR did not allege impersonation and the dispute appeared to have a financial character, those features did not persuade the Court to exercise the extraordinary discretion under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in favour of the applicant. The petition for pre-arrest bail was therefore rejected. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430967