<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 102 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31092</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that where exports are on FOB/CIF terms the place of removal is the load port and CHA services rendered to facilitate outward transportation up to that place qualify as input services. Service tax paid on such CHA services is eligible for CENVAT credit because they relate to clearance of final products from the place of removal. The Tribunal found the Department&#039;s appeals meritless and rejected them, distinguishing earlier contrary authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 102 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31092</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that where exports are on FOB/CIF terms the place of removal is the load port and CHA services rendered to facilitate outward transportation up to that place qualify as input services. Service tax paid on such CHA services is eligible for CENVAT credit because they relate to clearance of final products from the place of removal. The Tribunal found the Department&#039;s appeals meritless and rejected them, distinguishing earlier contrary authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>