<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the penalty imposed by the assessing officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act invalid due to a deficient notice that did not specify the nature of the alleged offense of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income. Citing judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unsustainable on legal grounds and deleted it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the penalty imposed by the assessing officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act invalid due to a deficient notice that did not specify the nature of the alleged offense of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income. Citing judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unsustainable on legal grounds and deleted it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>