<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 51 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430934</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Adjudicating Authority, which had dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It held that there was no pre-existing dispute related to the operational debt claimed by the Appellant. The Tribunal found the claimed amounts, including salary and other perks, to be valid operational debts as they were not disputed by the Respondent. The termination of employment on grounds of misconduct did not impact the validity of the operational debt claimed. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 51 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430934</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Adjudicating Authority, which had dismissed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It held that there was no pre-existing dispute related to the operational debt claimed by the Appellant. The Tribunal found the claimed amounts, including salary and other perks, to be valid operational debts as they were not disputed by the Respondent. The termination of employment on grounds of misconduct did not impact the validity of the operational debt claimed. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>