<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31088</link>
    <description>HC held that where a taxpayer following the mercantile system neither debited a sales-tax amount to the profit-and-loss account nor claimed any deduction, the assessing officer could not disallow or add back that amount to income under Section 43B. Because no expenditure was recorded or claimed, there was nothing properly disallowable; the AO&#039;s addition was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31088</link>
      <description>HC held that where a taxpayer following the mercantile system neither debited a sales-tax amount to the profit-and-loss account nor claimed any deduction, the assessing officer could not disallow or add back that amount to income under Section 43B. Because no expenditure was recorded or claimed, there was nothing properly disallowable; the AO&#039;s addition was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>