https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305381 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 11,02,500 as unexplained investment in property due to the appellant's failure to adequately explain the source of funds. It emphasized the importance of following due procedures, fair treatment of the assessee, and the relevance of evidence. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the case, stressing the need for a just and thorough appeal process based on merits and evidence. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2022 06:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305381 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 11,02,500 as unexplained investment in property due to the appellant's failure to adequately explain the source of funds. It emphasized the importance of following due procedures, fair treatment of the assessee, and the relevance of evidence. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the case, stressing the need for a just and thorough appeal process based on merits and evidence. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305381