https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305386 Isolated, stale, or broadly pleaded matrimonial incidents, especially where the spouses continued to cohabit for years and the conduct was thus condoned, do not meet the test of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband's divorce claim failed because the allegations lacked particulars, were not shown to be recurring or proximate to the petition, and did not establish cruelty on the governing legal standard. With cruelty not proved, the wife's case that the husband had withdrawn from her society without reasonable cause was made out, and restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 was granted; the marriage was held to subsist. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2022 06:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305386 Isolated, stale, or broadly pleaded matrimonial incidents, especially where the spouses continued to cohabit for years and the conduct was thus condoned, do not meet the test of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband's divorce claim failed because the allegations lacked particulars, were not shown to be recurring or proximate to the petition, and did not establish cruelty on the governing legal standard. With cruelty not proved, the wife's case that the husband had withdrawn from her society without reasonable cause was made out, and restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 was granted; the marriage was held to subsist. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305386