<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1311 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT) did not conduct any enquiry before passing the order under Section 263, rendering the order bad in law. Consequently, the impugned order was annulled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 06:28:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1311 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT) did not conduct any enquiry before passing the order under Section 263, rendering the order bad in law. Consequently, the impugned order was annulled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>