<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1229 - Central Information Commission</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305373</link>
    <description>The Commission clarified that redressal of the Appellant&#039;s grievance regarding the foreclosure of the health policy does not fall under the RTI Act. The Appellant was advised to seek recourse through the appropriate grievance redressal forum of the Public Authority. The Commission dismissed the appeal, noting that sufficient information had been provided to the Appellant, and the case was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1229 - Central Information Commission</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305373</link>
      <description>The Commission clarified that redressal of the Appellant&#039;s grievance regarding the foreclosure of the health policy does not fall under the RTI Act. The Appellant was advised to seek recourse through the appropriate grievance redressal forum of the Public Authority. The Commission dismissed the appeal, noting that sufficient information had been provided to the Appellant, and the case was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>