<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31083</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Tribunal in a case involving discrepancies in billing and payments under a mercantile system of accounting. The Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s explanation for the differences, emphasizing the practice of maintaining running accounts with clients. It concluded that no substantial legal question arose, dismissing the appeal and highlighting the significance of accounting methods and practices in evaluating financial discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 229 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31083</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Tribunal in a case involving discrepancies in billing and payments under a mercantile system of accounting. The Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s explanation for the differences, emphasizing the practice of maintaining running accounts with clients. It concluded that no substantial legal question arose, dismissing the appeal and highlighting the significance of accounting methods and practices in evaluating financial discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>