<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 35 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) under section 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961, which set aside the dropping of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal found that the revisionary order was untenable as it failed to demonstrate the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that revisionary authority can only direct fresh determination if the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding is proven erroneous, which was not the case in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 35 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) under section 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961, which set aside the dropping of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal found that the revisionary order was untenable as it failed to demonstrate the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that revisionary authority can only direct fresh determination if the Assessing Officer&#039;s finding is proven erroneous, which was not the case in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>