<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31082</link>
    <description>Chapter VI-A deductions were held inadmissible in computing undisclosed income for a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, as the point was already settled by prior precedent. Advance tax paid was also required to be given effect in the computation even where no return had been filed, again following binding decisions. On that basis, no substantial question of law survived for consideration in the section 260A appeal, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31082</link>
      <description>Chapter VI-A deductions were held inadmissible in computing undisclosed income for a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, as the point was already settled by prior precedent. Advance tax paid was also required to be given effect in the computation even where no return had been filed, again following binding decisions. On that basis, no substantial question of law survived for consideration in the section 260A appeal, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>