<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Madras High Court Rules No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Debatable Interest Income Classification Issue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66865</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Nature of interest income - capital receipt or revenue receipt - This being a highly debatable issue and once there is a debate as assessee’s present case, Hon’ble Madras High Court has admitted the substantial question of law against the order of Tribunal in quantum, we are of the view that assessee is not liable for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:43:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Madras High Court Rules No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Debatable Interest Income Classification Issue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66865</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Nature of interest income - capital receipt or revenue receipt - This being a highly debatable issue and once there is a debate as assessee’s present case, Hon’ble Madras High Court has admitted the substantial question of law against the order of Tribunal in quantum, we are of the view that assessee is not liable for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:43:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>