<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 22 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430905</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the sales commission and Section 14A disallowances. However, the ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, deleting the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 40A(2)(b). The judgment emphasizes the significance of consistent application of past rulings and the requirement for the AO to provide sufficient justification for disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 22 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430905</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the sales commission and Section 14A disallowances. However, the ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, deleting the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 40A(2)(b). The judgment emphasizes the significance of consistent application of past rulings and the requirement for the AO to provide sufficient justification for disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>