<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430898</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the Competent Authority&#039;s decision to set aside attachment orders under Section 37A(1) of the FEMA Act. The petitioner, an Assistant Director of the Directorate of Enforcement, was directed to file an appeal before the Tribunal within 45 days. The Court maintained interim protection for the attached properties until the appeal process was initiated, safeguarding the assets during the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430898</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the Competent Authority&#039;s decision to set aside attachment orders under Section 37A(1) of the FEMA Act. The petitioner, an Assistant Director of the Directorate of Enforcement, was directed to file an appeal before the Tribunal within 45 days. The Court maintained interim protection for the attached properties until the appeal process was initiated, safeguarding the assets during the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>