<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 13 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430896</link>
    <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s regular bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act due to the seriousness of the allegations involving fraud and money laundering totaling Rs.77 crores. Despite arguments of cooperation and lack of flight risk, the court emphasized the stringent conditions of Section 45 of the PMLA and the gravity of economic offenses, ultimately dismissing the bail application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 13 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430896</link>
      <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s regular bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act due to the seriousness of the allegations involving fraud and money laundering totaling Rs.77 crores. Despite arguments of cooperation and lack of flight risk, the court emphasized the stringent conditions of Section 45 of the PMLA and the gravity of economic offenses, ultimately dismissing the bail application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>