<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 131 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding a prima facie case for admissibility of benefits under Notifications No. 13/03-ST and No. 12/03-ST. It noted that the benefits were wrongly denied, and service tax in the Maintenance and Repairs Service category had already been paid by the principal. The Tribunal ordered a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery for the service tax and penalties, acknowledging the appellants&#039; position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 131 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding a prima facie case for admissibility of benefits under Notifications No. 13/03-ST and No. 12/03-ST. It noted that the benefits were wrongly denied, and service tax in the Maintenance and Repairs Service category had already been paid by the principal. The Tribunal ordered a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery for the service tax and penalties, acknowledging the appellants&#039; position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>