https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430893 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the wrongly availed Cenvat Credit demand, noting the appellant provided necessary documents and the demand was based on irrelevant findings. The rejection of the appeal for lack of mandatory pre-deposit was overturned as the appellant had fulfilled the deposit requirement. The invocation of the extended period without alleging suppression was deemed time-barred, as the appellant had disclosed all necessary details and had no motive to evade tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on these findings and discussions. en-us Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Dec 2022 07:43:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430893 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the wrongly availed Cenvat Credit demand, noting the appellant provided necessary documents and the demand was based on irrelevant findings. The rejection of the appeal for lack of mandatory pre-deposit was overturned as the appellant had fulfilled the deposit requirement. The invocation of the extended period without alleging suppression was deemed time-barred, as the appellant had disclosed all necessary details and had no motive to evade tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on these findings and discussions. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430893